Intertheoretic utility comparison: examples
discussion post by Stuart Armstrong 147 days ago | discuss

A previous post introduced the theory of intertheoretic utility comparison. This post will give examples of how to do that comparison, by normalising individual utility functions.

## The methods

All methods presented here obey the axioms of Relevant data, Continuity, Individual normalisation, and Symmetry. Later, we’ll see which ones follow Utility reflection, Cloning indifference, Weak irrelevance, and Strong irrelevance.

# Max, min, mean

The maximum of a utility function $$u$$ is $$\max_{s\in \mathbb{S}} u(s)$$, while the minimum is $$\min_{s\in \mathbb{S}} u(s)$$. The mean of $$u$$ $$\sum_{s\in \mathbb{S}} u(s)/||\mathbb{S}||$$.

• The max-min normalisation of $$[u]$$ is the $$u\in [u]$$ such that the maximum of $$u$$ is $$1$$ and the minimum is $$0$$.

• The max-mean normalisation of $$[u]$$ is the $$u\in [u]$$ such that the maximum of $$u$$ is $$1$$ and the mean is $$0$$.

The max-mean normalisation has an interesting feature: it’s precisely the amount of utility that an agent completely ignorant of its own utility, would pay to discover that utility (as a otherwise the agent would employ a random, ‘mean’, strategy).

For completeness, there is also:

• The mean-min normalisation of $$[u]$$ is the $$u\in [u]$$ such that the mean of $$u$$ is $$1$$ and the minimum is $$0$$.

The last two methods find ways of controlling the spread of possible utilities. For any utility $$u$$, define the mean difference: $$\sum_{s,s'\in\mathbb{S}} |u(s)-u(s')|$$. And define the variance: $$\sum_{s\in\mathbb{S}} (u(s)-\mu)^2$$, where $$\mu$$ is the mean defined previously.

• The mean difference normalisation of $$[u]$$ is the $$u\in [u]$$ such that $$u$$ has a mean difference of $$1$$.

• The variance normalisation of $$[u]$$ is the $$u\in [u]$$ such that $$u$$ has a variance of $$1$$.

## Properties

The different normalisation methods obey the following axioms:

 Max-min Max-mean Mean-min Mean difference Variance Utility reflection YES NO NO YES YES Cloning indifference YES NO NO NO NO Weak Irrelevance YES YES YES NO YES Strong Irrelevance YES YES YES NO NO

As can be seen, max-min normalisation, despite its crudeness, is the only one that obeys all the properties. If we have a measure on $$\mathbb{S}$$, then ignoring the cloning axiom becomes more reasonable. Strong irrelevance can in fact be seen as an anti-variance; it’s because of its second order aspect that it fails this.

### NEW DISCUSSION POSTS

Note that the problem with
 by Vadim Kosoy on Open Problems Regarding Counterfactuals: An Introd... | 0 likes

Typos on page 5: *
 by Vadim Kosoy on Open Problems Regarding Counterfactuals: An Introd... | 0 likes

Ah, you're right. So gain
 by Abram Demski on Smoking Lesion Steelman | 0 likes

> Do you have ideas for how
 by Jessica Taylor on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes

I think I understand what
 by Wei Dai on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes

>You don’t have to solve
 by Wei Dai on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes

 by Vadim Kosoy on Delegative Inverse Reinforcement Learning | 0 likes

My confusion is the
 by Tom Everitt on Delegative Inverse Reinforcement Learning | 0 likes

> First of all, it seems to
 by Abram Demski on Smoking Lesion Steelman | 0 likes

> figure out what my values
 by Vladimir Slepnev on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes

I agree that selection bias
 by Jessica Taylor on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes

>It seems quite plausible
 by Wei Dai on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes

> defending against this type
 by Paul Christiano on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes

2. I think that we can avoid
 by Paul Christiano on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes

I hope you stay engaged with
 by Wei Dai on Autopoietic systems and difficulty of AGI alignmen... | 0 likes