Indifference and compensatory rewards discussion post by Stuart Armstrong 157 days ago | discuss A putative new idea for AI control; index here. It’s occurred to me that there is a framework where we can see all “indifference” results as corrective rewards, both for the utility function change indifference and for the policy change indifference. Imagine that the agent has reward $$R_0$$ and is following policy $$\pi_0$$, and we want to change it to having reward $$R_1$$ and following policy $$\pi_1$$. Then the corrective reward we need to pay it, so that it doesn’t attempt to resist or cause that change, is simply the difference between the two expected values: $$V(R_0|\pi_0)-V(R_1|\pi_1)$$, where $$V$$ is the agent’s own valuation of the expected reward, conditional on the policy. This explains why off-policy reward-based agents are already safely interruptible: since we change the policy, not the reward, $$R_0=R_1$$. And since off-policy agents have value estimates that are indifferent to the policy followed, $$V(R_0|\pi_0)=V(R_1|\pi_1)$$, and the compensatory rewards are zero.

### NEW DISCUSSION POSTS

A few thoughts: I agree
 by Sam Eisenstat on Some Criticisms of the Logical Induction paper | 0 likes

Thanks, so to paraphrase your
 by Wei Dai on Current thoughts on Paul Christano's research agen... | 0 likes

> Why does Paul think that
 by Paul Christiano on Current thoughts on Paul Christano's research agen... | 0 likes

Given that ALBA was not meant
 by Wei Dai on Current thoughts on Paul Christano's research agen... | 0 likes

Thank you for writing this.
 by Wei Dai on Current thoughts on Paul Christano's research agen... | 1 like

I mostly agree with this
 by Paul Christiano on Current thoughts on Paul Christano's research agen... | 2 likes

>From my perspective, I don’t
 by Johannes Treutlein on Smoking Lesion Steelman | 2 likes

 by Vadim Kosoy on Some Criticisms of the Logical Induction paper | 0 likes

 by Vadim Kosoy on Some Criticisms of the Logical Induction paper | 0 likes

 by Vadim Kosoy on Some Criticisms of the Logical Induction paper | 0 likes

Yeah, you're right. This
 by Vadim Kosoy on Smoking Lesion Steelman | 1 like

The non-smoke-loving agents
 by Abram Demski on Smoking Lesion Steelman | 1 like