Intelligent Agent Foundations Forumsign up / log in
by Jessica Taylor 430 days ago | link | parent

Hmm… I’m finding that I’m unable to write down a simple shutdown problem in this framework (e.g. an environment where it should switch between maximizing paperclips and shutting down) to analyze what this algorithm does. To know what the algorithm does, I need to know what \(P\) and \(\hat{P}\) are (since these are parameters of the algorithm). From those I can derive \(P'\) and \(\hat{P}'\) to determine the agent’s action. But at the moment I have no way of proceeding, since I don’t know what \(P\) and \(\hat{P}\) are. Can you get me unstuck?



by Stuart Armstrong 424 days ago | link

Suppose the humans have already decided whether to press the shutdown or order the AI to maximise paperclips. If \(o_s\) is the observation of the shutdown command and \(o_p\) the observation of the paperclip maximising command, and \(u_s\) and \(u_p\) the relevant utilities, then \(P\) can be defined as \(P(u_s|h_{m-1}o_s)=1\) and \(P(u_p|h_{m-1}o_p)=1\), for all histories \(h_{m-1}\).

Then define \(\widehat{P}\) as the probability of \(o_s\) versus \(o_p\), conditional on the fact that the agent follows a particular deterministic policy \(\pi^0\).

If the agent does indeed follow \(\pi^0\), then \(\widehat{P}=\widehat{P}'\). If it varies from this policy, then \(\widehat{P}'\) is altered in proportion to the expected change in \(\widehat{P}\) caused by choosing a different action.

reply



NEW LINKS

NEW POSTS

NEW DISCUSSION POSTS

RECENT COMMENTS

[Delegative Reinforcement
by Vadim Kosoy on Stable Pointers to Value II: Environmental Goals | 1 like

Intermediate update: The
by Alex Appel on Further Progress on a Bayesian Version of Logical ... | 0 likes

Since Briggs [1] shows that
by 258 on In memoryless Cartesian environments, every UDT po... | 2 likes

This doesn't quite work. The
by Nisan Stiennon on Logical counterfactuals and differential privacy | 0 likes

I at first didn't understand
by Sam Eisenstat on An Untrollable Mathematician | 1 like

This is somewhat related to
by Vadim Kosoy on The set of Logical Inductors is not Convex | 0 likes

This uses logical inductors
by Abram Demski on The set of Logical Inductors is not Convex | 0 likes

Nice writeup. Is one-boxing
by Tom Everitt on Smoking Lesion Steelman II | 0 likes

Hi Alex! The definition of
by Vadim Kosoy on Delegative Inverse Reinforcement Learning | 0 likes

A summary that might be
by Alex Appel on Delegative Inverse Reinforcement Learning | 1 like

I don't believe that
by Alex Appel on Delegative Inverse Reinforcement Learning | 0 likes

This is exactly the sort of
by Stuart Armstrong on Being legible to other agents by committing to usi... | 0 likes

When considering an embedder
by Jack Gallagher on Where does ADT Go Wrong? | 0 likes

The differences between this
by Abram Demski on Policy Selection Solves Most Problems | 1 like

Looking "at the very
by Abram Demski on Policy Selection Solves Most Problems | 0 likes

RSS

Privacy & Terms